June 28, 2003

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2003

 

OR

 

¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                  to                 

 

Commission File Number: 0-23081

 

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Florida   59-3157093
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

125 Technology Park Drive, Lake Mary, Florida

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

32746

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code:   407-333-9911

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x    NO ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨    No x

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of June 28, 2003 was 11,950,130

 



FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 28, 2003

 

INDEX

 

     Page
Number


Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    

Item 1. Financial Statements

    

a)      Consolidated Balance Sheets

   3

As of June 28, 2003 and December 31, 2002

    

b)      Consolidated Statements of Operations

   4

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2002

    

c)      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   5

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2002

    

d)      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   6-12

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   12-18

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   18

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

   18

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

    

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

   19-20

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

   21

SIGNATURES

   21

CERTIFICATIONS

   22-25

 

2


PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.    Financial Statements

 

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    

June 28,

2003


    December 31,
2002


 
     (unaudited)        
ASSETS             

CURRENT ASSETS:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,550,949     $ 4,023,614  

Short-term investments

     1,603,576       1,437,537  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $939,676 and $851,852, respectively

     14,174,674       14,236,160  

Inventories, net of allowance for inventory obsolesence of $110,233 and $89,969, respectively

     11,843,267       9,126,857  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     891,354       1,142,576  
    


 


Total current assets

     32,063,820       29,966,744  
    


 


PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—at cost:

                

Machinery and equipment

     5,225,924       5,338,681  

Furniture and fixtures

     2,185,930       1,342,207  

Leasehold improvements

     411,484       332,082  
    


 


Total

     7,823,338       7,012,970  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     (5,595,566 )     (4,995,111 )
    


 


Property and equipment, net

     2,227,772       2,017,859  
    


 


INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of amortization of $11,682,339 and $9,846,241, respectively

     11,408,143       11,542,489  

INVESTMENTS

     —         427,478  

NOTES RECEIVABLE

     1,361,876       1,240,210  
    


 


TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 47,061,611     $ 45,194,780  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

                

Current portion of long-term debt

   $ 42,728     $ 49,450  

Amounts due under credit line

     1,489,259       1,459,647  

Accounts payable

     4,528,870       4,781,243  

Accrued liabilities

     3,051,515       3,202,231  

Income taxes payable

     503,268       106,954  

Current portion of unearned service revenues

     1,475,468       1,930,736  

Customer deposits

     143,771       97,942  
    


 


Total current liabilities

     11,234,879       11,628,203  

UNEARNED SERVICE REVENUES—less current portion

     996,369       135,900  

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

     35,645       47,028  
    


 


TOTAL LIABILITIES

     12,266,893       11,811,131  
    


 


COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

                

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

                

Class A preferred stock—par value $.001, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

     —         —    

Common stock—par value $.001, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 11,990,130 and 11,931,726 issued; 11,950,130 and 11,891,726 outstanding, respectively

     11,990       11,932  

Additional paid-in-capital

     49,800,244       49,462,548  

Unearned compensation

     (104,434 )     (14,768 )

Accumulated deficit

     (12,084,256 )     (14,131,669 )

Other comprehensive loss

     (2,678,201 )     (1,793,769 )

Common stock in treasury, at cost—40,000 shares

     (150,625 )     (150,625 )
    


 


Total shareholders’ equity

     34,794,718       33,383,649  
    


 


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   $ 47,061,611     $ 45,194,780  
    


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

3


FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Three Months Ended

    Six Months Ended

 
    

June 28

2003


   

June 30

2002


   

June 28

2003


   

June 30

2002


 

SALES

   $ 16,243,469     $ 10,309,596     $ 29,647,734     $ 19,031,207  

COST OF SALES

     6,183,034       5,207,726       12,082,614       9,036,359  
    


 


 


 


Gross profit

     10,060,435       5,101,870       17,565,120       9,994,848  

OPERATING EXPENSES:

                                

Selling

     4,484,859       3,415,740       8,272,298       6,642,663  

General and administrative

     2,297,315       2,169,447       4,047,880       3,727,128  

Depreciation and amortization

     538,991       621,027       1,127,645       1,282,386  

Research and development

     1,066,155       1,149,625       1,943,623       2,372,431  

Employee stock options

     108,290       (11,375 )     149,738       2,022  
    


 


 


 


Total operating expenses

     8,495,610       7,344,464       15,541,184       14,026,630  
    


 


 


 


INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS

     1,564,824       (2,242,594 )     2,023,936       (4,031,782 )

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)

                                

Interest income

     33,489       35,723       36,154       241,451  

Other income, net

     218,730       199,915       334,470       171,529  

Interest expense

     (18,661 )     (1,981 )     (34,558 )     (3,097 )
    


 


 


 


NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX

     1,798,382       (2,008,937 )     2,360,002       (3,621,899 )

INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)

     240,334       (2,801 )     312,589       37,000  
    


 


 


 


NET INCOME (LOSS)

   $ 1,558,049     $ (2,006,136 )   $ 2,047,413     $ (3,658,899 )
    


 


 


 


NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE—BASIC

   $ 0.13     $ (0.17 )   $ 0.17     $ (0.31 )
    


 


 


 


NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE—DILUTED

   $ 0.12     $ (0.17 )   $ 0.16     $ (0.31 )
    


 


 


 


Weighted average shares—Basic

     11,936,466       11,885,252       11,903,112       11,809,697  
    


 


 


 


Weighted average shares—Diluted

     12,721,397       11,885,252       12,471,833       11,809,697  
    


 


 


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

4


FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Six Months Ended

 
     June 28, 2003

    June 30, 2002

 

CASH FLOWS FROM:

                

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

                

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,047,413     $ (3,658,899 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used in) by operating activities:

                

Depreciation and amortization

     1,127,645       1,282,386  

Provision for bad debts

     279,955       461,931  

Foreign currency (losses)

     (121,666 )     (120,643 )

Inventory write-down

     (180,206 )     —    

Provision for inventory losses

     192,499       938,007  

Employee stock options

     149,738       2,022  

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

                

Decrease (increase) in:

                

Accounts receivable

     (218,469 )     1,947,711  

Income taxes refundable

     —         545,118  

Inventories

     (2,728,703 )     (1,537,299 )

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     251,222       280,186  

Increase (decrease) in:

                

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     (403,089 )     (3,164,023 )

Income taxes payable

     396,313       7,003  

Customer deposits

     45,829       (159,212 )

Deferred revenues

     405,201       (228,843 )
    


 


Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     1,243,682       (3,404,555 )
    


 


INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

                

Acquisition of SMX

     —         (3,028,615 )

Purchases of property and equipment

     (810,368 )     (691,123 )

Payments for Intangible assets

     (265,332 )     (325,144 )

Proceeds from Investments

     261,439       3,508,526  
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (814,261 )     (536,356 )
    


 


FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

                

Borrowings under line of credit

     29,612       —    

Payments of long-term debt, capital lease obligations and notes payable

     (18,294 )     (7,189 )

Proceeds from issuance of stock, net

     337,754       —    
    


 


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     349,072       (7,189 )
    


 


EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH

     (1,251,158 )     209,323  
    


 


INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     (472,665 )     (3,738,777 )

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

     4,023,614       7,238,564  
    


 


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

   $ 3,550,949     $ 3,499,787  
    


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

5


FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2002

(Unaudited)

 

NOTE A – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries develop, manufacture, market and support Computer Aided Design (CAD)-based quality assurance products and CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FARO Technologies, Inc. and all wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date, for assets and liabilities, and the average exchange rates during each reporting period, for results of operations. Adjustments resulting from translation of the financial statements are reflected as a separate component of comprehensive loss in shareholders’ equity.

 

NOTE B – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and related interim consolidated statements of operations, other comprehensive income and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Preparing financial statement requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results and outcomes may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

 

The consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 28, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003. The information included in this Form 10-Q (including the interim consolidated financial statements and notes that accompany these financial statements) should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements reported as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each of the three years included in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities (“VIE’s”) created after January 31, 2003, and to VIE’s in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 to VIE’s in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. FIN 46 applies to public enterprises as of the beginning of the applicable interim or annual period. The company currently has no interest in any VIE.

 

6


At the November 21, 2002 EITF meeting the Task Force reached a consensus on Issue 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor (Issue 02-16). Issue 02-16 addresses the accounting by a vendor for consideration given to a customer, including both a reseller of the vendor’s products and an entity that purchases the vendor’s products from a reseller. Issue 02-16 provides accounting guidance on how a vendor should characterize consideration given to a customer and when to recognize and how to measure that consideration in its income statement. It should be applied to new arrangements, including modifications of existing arrangements, entered into after December 31, 2002. The Company does not believe the adoption of Issue 02-16 will have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

 

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure (FAS 148). FAS 148 amends an earlier standard on accounting for stock-based compensation, FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123), to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, FAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of FAS 123 to require more prominent disclosure about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The additional disclosure requirements of FAS 148 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002.

 

The Company continues to follow the intrinsic value method of accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, to account for employee stock options issued.

 

The following table illustrates the effects on net income (loss) and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

 

     Three Months Ended

    Six Months Ended

 
    

June 28

2003


   

June 30

2002


   

June 28

2003


   

June 30

2002


 

Net income (loss), as reported

   $ 1,558,049     $ (2,006,136 )   $ 2,047,413     $ (3,658,899 )

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

     (50,466 )     (207,375 )     (107,249 )     (280,540 )
    


 


 


 


Pro forma net income (loss)

   $ 1,507,583     $ (2,213,511 )   $ 1,940,164     $ (3,939,439 )
    


 


 


 


Earnings (Loss) Per share:

                                

Basic—as reported

   $ 0.13     ($ 0.17 )   $ 0.17     ($ 0.31 )
    


 


 


 


Basic—Pro forma

   $ 0.13     ($ 0.18 )   $ 0.16     ($ 0.33 )
    


 


 


 


Diluted—as reported

   $ 0.12     ($ 0.17 )   $ 0.16     ($ 0.31 )
    


 


 


 


Diluted—Pro forma

   $ 0.11     ($ 0.18 )   $ 0.15     ($ 0.33 )
    


 


 


 


 

7


On January 1, 2003, the Company modified its accounting calendar in which the reporting quarters end on the last Saturday nearest to the calendar month-end, with the exception of the year end date. Consequently, the second quarter ended on June 28, 2003. The Company feels that this change did not materially impact the second quarter. The ending dates for all subsequent quarters in the reporting year of 2003 are as follows:

 

3rd Quarter September 27, 2003

4th Quarter December 31, 2003

 

NOTE C – CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS

 

Cash and cash equivalents—We consider cash on hand, and amounts on deposit with financial institutions, which have original maturities of three months or less, to be cash and cash equivalents. All short-term investments in debt securities which have maturities of three months or less are classified as cash and equivalents, and carried at market value based upon the quoted market prices of those investments at each respective balance sheet date. Amounts classified as short-term investments are securities which will mature in less than one year.

 

Investments—Investments ordinarily consist of debt securities acquired with cash not immediately needed in operations. Such amounts have maturities exceeding one year. As of June 28, 2003 and December 31, 2002 investments consisted of corporate bonds with a market value of $-0- and $427,478, respectively.

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information—Selected cash payments and non cash activities were as follows:

 

     Six months ended

     June 28,
2003


  

June 30,

2002


Cash paid for interest

   $ —      $ 2,964
    

  

Non-cash investing activities:

             

Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of SMX

   $ —      $ 1,827,500
    

  

 

8


NOTE D – INVENTORIES

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

     As of June 28,
2003


    As of
December 31,
2002


 

Raw materials

   $ 3,695,207     $ 3,214,119  

Work-in-process

     2,210,742       1,580,667  

Finished goods

     2,190,844       883,063  

Sales demonstration

     3,856,707       3,538,977  

Allowance for inventory obsolesence

     (110,233 )     (89,969 )
    


 


     $ 11,843,267     $ 9,126,857  
    


 


 

NOTE E – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

 

A reconciliation of the number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is presented below:

 

     Three months ended

    Six months ended

 
     June 28, 2003

    June 30, 2002

    June 28, 2003

    June 30, 2002

 
     Shares

  

Per-share

Amount


    Shares

  

Per-share

Amount


    Shares

   Per-share
Amount


    Shares

   Per-share
Amount


 

Basic EPS

   11,936,466    $ 0.13     11,885,252    ($ 0.17 )   11,903,112    $ 0.17     11,809,530    ($ 0.31 )

Effect of dilutive securities

   784,931    ($ 0.01 )   —        —       568,721    ($ 0.01 )   —        —    
    
  


 
  


 
  


 
  


Diluted EPS

   12,721,397    $ 0.12     11,885,252    ($ 0.17 )   12,471,833    $ 0.16     11,809,530    ($ 0.31 )
    
  


 
  


 
  


 
  


 

NOTE F – INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)

 

The tax provision for the six months ended June 28, 2003 is not comparable to the tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2002, principally due to increases in earnings. The effective tax rate of 13% is lower than current federal statutory corporate rates primarily due to the application of net-operating-loss carry-forwards in non US entities.

 

9


NOTE G – SEGMENT GEOGRAPHIC DATA

 

The Company develops, manufactures, markets and supports Computer Aided Design (CAD)-based quality assurance products and CAD-based inspection and statistical process control software. This one line of business represents more than 98% of consolidated sales. Operating through sales teams established in geographic regions, each team is equipped to deliver the entire line of FARO products to customers within its geographic area. We have aggregated the sales teams into a single operating segment as a result of the similarities in the nature of products sold, the type of customers and the methods used to distribute our products.

 

The following table presents sales information by the geographic region of the customer:

 

     Three Months Ended

   Six Months Ended

     June 28, 2003

   June 30, 2002

   June 28, 2003

   June 30, 2002

SALES

                           

Americas Region

   $ 8,085,311    $ 5,263,463    $ 13,685,443    $ 9,484,825

Europe / Africa Region

     6,858,401      3,824,336      12,847,761      7,218,958

Asia Pacific Region

     1,299,757      1,218,797      3,114,530      2,327,424
    

  

  

  

TOTAL

   $ 16,243,469    $ 10,306,596    $ 29,647,734    $ 19,031,207
    

  

  

  

 

NOTE H – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Comprehensive income includes the effect of currency translation adjustments on the investments in (capitalization of) foreign subsidiaries combined with the earnings (loss) from operations.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Three Months Ended

    Six Months Ended

 
    

June 28

2003


   

June 30

2002


   

June 28

2003


   

June 30

2002


 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

   $ 1,558,049     $ (2,006,136 )   $ 2,047,413     $ (3,658,899 )

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):

                                

Currency translation adjustments

     (1,548,024 )     1,027,389       (884,432 )     819,414  
    


 


 


 


COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

   $ 10,025     $ (978,747 )   $ 1,162,981     $ (2,839,485 )
    


 


 


 


 

10


NOTE I – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On January 16, 2002, the Company acquired SpatialMetriX Corporation (“SMX”), a leading manufacturer and supplier of laser trackers, metrology software and contract inspection services. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 14, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”), the Company acquired SMX in exchange for 500,000 shares of FARO common stock (50,000 shares of which are being held in escrow) that were to be delivered to the former SMX stockholders. In connection with the acquisition, the Company also (a) issued 350,000 shares of FARO common stock and paid $2.0 million in cash to fully satisfy SMX’s obligations to its two lenders, and (b) assumed or satisfied other debts of SMX.

 

On July 9, 2003, the Company filed with the American Arbitration Association a Statement of Claim (i.e., a demand for arbitration) against John Martinson, as the representative of the former SMX stockholders, for indemnification relating to various breaches of the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement. The Company’s claims principally relate to SMX’s failure to follow generally accepted accounting principles before its acquisition by the Company, SMX’s failure to present fairly in all material respects its financial condition as of December 31, 2001, and SMX’s failure to disclose various liabilities of SMX that arose on or before December 31, 2001. The arbitration is binding and will be held in Tampa, Florida, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.

 

SMX’s former stockholders are obligated, subject to various limitations under the Agreement, to indemnify the Company for breaches of the representations and warranties in the Agreement in proportion to their prior ownership interests in SMX. The Company alleges in the Statement of Claim that it is entitled to $2,286,188 in damages from the former SMX stockholders. To satisfy the indemnity obligations of the former SMX stockholders, the Company previously asserted its right to set off the remaining 422,956 shares of FARO common stock (which includes the 50,000 shares being held in escrow) that have not been delivered to the former SMX stockholders under the Agreement. However, all 850,000 shares of FARO common stock that were to be delivered in connection with the SMX acquisition are considered issued and outstanding shares and are taken into account when computing earnings per share.

 

On or about July 31, 2003, Mr. Martinson, as the representative of the former SMX stockholders, filed an answer to the Company’s Statement of Claim and asserted various counterclaims against the Company. On behalf of SMX’s former stockholders, Mr. Martinson has denied any obligation to indemnify the Company for the allegations described in the Statement of Claim.

 

Moreover, Mr. Martinson has alleged that the Company’s failure to deliver the 422,956 shares of FARO common stock to SMX’s former stockholders under the Agreement constitutes a breach by the Company of the Agreement and that the Company is obligated to indemnify the former SMX stockholders for their damages as result of this breach. Mr. Martinson also has alleged that FARO has converted the 422,956 shares that have not been delivered to SMX’s former stockholders and that FARO has been unjustly enriched by failing to deliver these shares. Mr. Martinson has requested that the arbitrators award damages to the former SMX stockholders as a result of these claims, including punitive damages.

 

11


The Company cannot predict the outcome of SMX arbitration or the impact it may have on the Company. The outcome of the counterclaims asserted in the SMX arbitration could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

 

The following information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report, Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

The Company has made forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) in this report that are subject to risks and uncertainties, such as statements about our plans, objectives, projections, expectations, assumptions, strategies, or future events. Other written or oral statements, which constitute forward-looking statements, also may be made by the Company from time to time. Words such as “may,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “will,” “should,” “could,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts or that describe our future plans, objectives, or goals also are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results, performances, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Consequently, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) the potential loss of material customers; (ii) the failure to properly manage growth and successfully integrate acquired businesses; (iii) inability of the Company’s products to attain broad market acceptance or increased length of the Company’s sales cycle; (iv) inability of the Company to maintain or reduce expenses, maintain its historical gross margin, or maintain its historical sales growth rates; (v) the impact of competitive products and pricing; (vi) delays in shipping products, ramping-up production in Europe, or opening its sales office in China, (vii) fluctuations in quarterly operating results as a result of the size, timing and recognition of revenue from significant orders, increases in operating expenses required for product development and sales and marketing, the timing and market acceptance of new products and product enhancements; customer order deferrals in anticipation of new products and product enhancements; the Company’s success in expanding its sales and marketing programs, and general economic conditions; (viii) the financial condition of the Company’s customers; (ix) adverse consequences of exchange rate fluctuations; (x) risks associated with establishing manufacturing operations outside of the U.S. and increased sales occurring outside of the U.S., such as difficulties in staffing and managing facilities located outside of the U.S., political and economic instability, potentially adverse tax consequences, the burden of complying with complex foreign laws and treaties, and adverse trade protection laws; (xi) inability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights; (xii) dependence on Simon Raab and Gregory A. Fraser and other key personnel; and (xiii) the cyclical nature of both the Company’s business and the industries of the Company’s customers.

 

12


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FARO Technologies, Inc. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The financial statements of the foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date, for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during each reporting period for results of operations. Adjustments resulting from translation of financial statements are reflected as a separate component of accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity.

 

Results of Operations

 

Three Months Ended June 28, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2002

 

Sales increased by $5.9 million or 57.6%, from $10.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $16.2 million for three months ended June 28, 2003. The increase resulted from higher sales: Americas Region ($2.8 million), Europe/Africa Region ($3.0 million), and Asia Pacific Region ($100,000). Sales increased primarily due to new product additions, price increases and increased unit sales.

 

Gross profit increased by $5.0 million or 97.2%, from $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $10.1 million for the three months ended June 28, 2003 due to higher sales volumes, as stated above in “Sales”. Gross margin increased to 61.9% or 25.1% higher for the three months ended June 28, 2003 from 49.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Gross profit increased due to higher selling prices and increases in Laser Tracker manufacturing plant output.

 

Selling expenses increased by $1.1 million or 31.3%, from $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $4.5 million for the three months ended June 28, 2003. This increase was due primarily to increased sales commissions, salaries, and marketing expenses. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses dropped to 27.6% of sales in the three months ended June 28, 2003 from 33.1% in the three months ended June 30, 2002.

 

General and administrative expenses increased by $128,000 or 6.0 %, from $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $2.3 million for the three months ended June 28, 2003. Increased costs included professional fees and insurance, partially offset by lower bad debt expense and lower taxes and fees. While an increase in general and administrative expenses was experienced for the three months ended June 28, 2003 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002, this amount represents a decrease in the percentage of sales from 21.0% to 14.1%.

 

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $82,000 or 13.2% from $621,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $539,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003, due primarily to the discontinuance of amortization of Goodwill in accordance with GAAP.

 

Research and development expenses decreased by $83,000, or 7.3%, from $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 28, 2003.

 

Employee Stock Option expenses increased by $119,000, from a benefit of $11,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to an expense of $108,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003.

 

13


Interest income decreased by $2,000 or 6.3%, from $35,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, to $33,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower investments. Interest expense increased by $17,000 from $2,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $19,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003. This was due to the use of a credit line previously established for short term needs (see Liquidity and Capital Resources below).

 

Other income increased by $19,000 from of $200,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $219,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003 due primarily to gains on currency translation.

 

Income tax expense increased by $243,000 from a benefit of $3,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, to an expense of $240,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003. This increase is primarily due to the significant increase in US earnings over the first quarter.

 

Net income increased by $3.6 million from a loss of $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to income of $1.6 million for the three months ended June 28, 2003 as a result of the factors described above.

 

14


Six Months Ended June 28, 2003 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2002

 

Sales increased by $10.6 million or 55.8%, from $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $ 29.6 million for six months ended June 28, 2003. The increase resulted from higher sales in Americas Region ($4.2 million), the Europe/Africa Region ($5.6 million), and Asia Pacific Region ($800,000). Sales increased primarily due to new product additions, price increases and increased unit sales.

 

Gross profit increased by $7.6 million or 75.7%, from $10.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $17.6 million for the six months ended June 28, 2003 due to higher sales, as stated above in “Sales”. Gross margin increased to 59.2% or 12.8% higher for the six months ended June 28, 2003 from 52.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Gross profit increased due to higher selling prices and increases in Laser Tracker manufacturing plant output.

 

Selling expenses increased by $1.6 million or 24.5%, from $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $8.3 million for the six months ended June 28, 2003. This increase was due primarily to increased sales commissions and higher costs in Europe for marketing, salaries. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses dropped to 27.9% of sales in the six months ended June 28, 2003 from 34.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2002.

 

General and administrative expenses increased by $321,000 or 8.6%, from $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 28, 2003. The higher costs were due primarily to increases in administrative expenses to support the higher sales volume. Increased costs included professional fees, insurance, and telecommunications. While an increase in general and administrative expenses was experienced for the six months ended June 28, 2003 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2002, this amount represents a decrease in the percentage of sales from 19.6% to 13.7%.

 

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $155,000 or 12.1% from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 28, 2003, due primarily to the discontinuance of amortization of Goodwill according to GAAP.

 

Research and development expenses decreased by $429,000, or 18.1%, from $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.9 million for the six months ended June 28, 2003 principally as a result of reduced research and development salaries. The decrease was principally due to shifting of personnel to administrative positions costs in Europe and lower expenses for the new laser tracker product line.

 

Employee Stock Option expenses increased by $148,000, from $2,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $150,000 for the three months ended June 28, 2003.

 

Interest income decreased by $205,000 or 85.0%, from $241,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, to $36,000 for the six months ended June 28, 2003. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower investments. Interest expense increased by $32,000 from $3,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $35,000 for the six months ended June 28, 2003. This was due to the use of a credit line previously established for short term needs (see Liquidity and Capital Resources below).

 

Other income increased by $163,000 from income of $172,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to income of $334,000 for the six months ended June 28, 2003 due primarily to gains on currency translation.

 

15


Income tax expense increased by $276,000 from $37,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, to $313,000 for the six months ended June 28, 2003. This increase is primarily due to the significant increase in US earnings in 2003 compared to losses during the six months ended June 30, 2002.

 

Net income increased by $5.7 million from a loss of $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to income of $2.0 million for the six months ended June 28, 2003 as a result of the factors described above.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Since 1997, the Company has financed its operations primarily from cash provided by operating activities and from the proceeds of its 1997 initial public offering of common stock (approximately $31.7 million). Total marketable securities (cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and investments) at June 28, 2003 were approximately $5.1 million compared with approximately $5.9 million on December 31, 2002. This represents a decrease of approximately $800,000 during the six months ended June 28, 2003 due to increased working capital requirements to support the increased sales.

 

Principal commitments at June 28, 2003 consisted of leases on the Company’s offices and manufacturing facilities, and purchase orders for goods related to manufacturing. There were no material commitments for capital expenditures as of that date.

 

The Company believes that its cash, investments, borrowings and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months. However, the company is pursuing alternative financing, including a larger line of credit to provide cash for additional operating flexibility. new product development and acquisitions.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In response to the SEC’S financial reporting release, FR-60, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies, we have selected our most subjective accounting estimation processes for purposes of explaining the methodology used in calculating the estimate in addition to any inherent uncertainties pertaining to the estimate and the possible effects on the Company’s financial condition. The estimation processes discussed below are the Company’s process of recognizing research and development expenditures, the allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventory, the allowance for doubtful accounts, and the reserve for warranties. These estimation processes affect current assets and operating results and are therefore critical in assessing the financial and operating status of the Company. These estimates involve certain assumptions that if incorrect, could create an adverse impact on the Company’s operations and financial position.

 

Research And Development

 

Costs are incurred in the discovery of new knowledge and the resulting translation of this new knowledge into plans and designs for new products. Prior to the attainment of the related products’ technological feasibility, these costs are recorded as expenses in the period incurred. Product design costs incurred in the development of products after technological feasibility is attained are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the related products, not to exceed three years. The Company considers technological feasibility to be established when the Company has completed all planning, designing, coding and testing activities that are necessary to establish design specifications including function, features and technical performance requirements. Capitalization of product design costs ceases and amortization of such costs begins when the product is available for general release to customers. The Company periodically assesses the

 

16


value of capitalized product design costs and records a reserve for obsolescence or impairment when, in the circumstances (including the discontinuance or probable discontinuance of the related products from the market), it deems the asset to be obsolete or impaired.

 

The Reserve For Obsolete And Slow-Moving Inventory

 

Since the amount of inventoriable cost that the Company will truly recoup through sales cannot be known with exact certainty, the Company relies upon both past sales experience and future sales forecasts. Inventory is considered obsolete if the Company has withdrawn those products from the market or if the Company has had no sales of the product for the past 12 months, and has no sales forecasted for the next 12 months. Accordingly, an allowance in an amount equal to 100% of the average cost of such inventory is recorded. The Company classifies as “slow-moving”, inventory with on-hand quantities greater than the amounts sold in the past 12 months or which have been forecasted to sell in the next 12 months, and reserves such an amount adequate to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value.

 

The Reserve For Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customers and adjusts their credit ratings accordingly. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains a provision for un-collectible amounts based on its historical experience and any other issues it has identified. While such credit losses have historically been within its expectations, the Company cannot guarantee this will continue in the future.

 

The Reserve For Warranties

 

The Company relies upon its service data to determine the adequacy of its warranty reserve. The Company uses the service frequencies and history to evaluate the future service requirements. The Company continuously monitors this data to ensure that the reserve is sufficient. While such expenses have historically been within its expectations, the Company cannot guarantee this will continue in the future.

 

Change in Accounting Calendar

 

On January 1, 2003, the Company modified its accounting calendar in which the reporting quarters end on the last Saturday nearest to the calendar month-end, with the exception of the year end date. Consequently the first quarter ended on March 28, 2003 and the second quarter ending June 28, 2003. The Company feels that this change did not materially impact either quarter. The ending dates for all subsequent quarters in the reporting year of 2003 are as follows:

 

3rd Quarter September 27, 2003

4th Quarter December 31, 2003

 

Transactions with Related and Other Parties

 

The Company leases its headquarters from Xenon Research, Inc. (“Xenon”), all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of which is owned by Simon Raab, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Diana Raab, his spouse. The term of the lease expires on February 28, 2006, with two five-year renewal options. The base rent during renewal periods will reflect changes in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers.

 

In June 2000, the Company and each of Wendelin Scharbach and Siegfried Buss, the two former shareholders of CATS GmbH, entered into an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement pursuant to which the Company granted loans to the former shareholders of CATS GmbH in the aggregate amount of $1.1 million (“the Loans”). The Company acquired CATS GmbH in 1998, and making the loans to Messrs. Scharbach and Buss was a contractual obligation of the Company

 

17


pursuant to the acquisition agreement. The Loans were intended to fund the tax obligations of Messrs. Scharbach and Buss incurred in connection with the Company’s acquisition of CATS GmbH. Messrs. Scharbach and Buss both continue to serve as officers of the Company. The Loans were for an initial term of three years, and could be extended for an additional three years at the option of the borrowers. Each borrower has exercised its right to extend the term for an additional three years. The Loans accrue interest at an annual rate of approximately 4.7%. As collateral for the Loans, Messrs. Scharbach and Buss pledged to the Company an aggregate of 177,074 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The loans are a non-recourse obligation of Messrs. Scharbach and Buss, which means that the value of the shares of Common Stock that the Company holds as collateral for the Loans is the maximum amount that the Company can recover from Messrs. Scharbach and Buss when the Loans are repaid at the end of their respective terms.

 

Inflation

 

The Company believes that inflation has not had a material impact on its results of operations in recent years and it does not expect inflation to have a material impact on its operations in 2003.

 

Foreign Exchange Exposure

 

The Company conducts a significant portion of its business outside the United States. At present, approximately 50% of the Company’s revenues are invoiced, and a significant portion of its operating expenses paid, in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition, and could specifically result in foreign exchange gains and losses. The impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on the results of the Company’s operations cannot be accurately predicted. To the extent that the percentage of the Company’s non-U.S. dollar revenues derived from international sales increases (or decreases) in the future, the Company’s exposure to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may increase (or decrease).

 

Item 3.—Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference herein from the section of this Report in Part I, Item 2, under the captions “Inflation” and “Foreign Exchange Exposure”, above.

 

Item 4.—Controls And Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC reports.

 

18


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.—Legal Proceedings

 

On January 16, 2002, the Company acquired SpatialMetriX Corporation (“SMX”), a leading manufacturer and supplier of laser trackers, metrology software and contract inspection services. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 14, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”), the Company acquired SMX in exchange for 500,000 shares of FARO common stock (50,000 shares of which are being held in escrow) that were to be delivered to the former SMX stockholders. In connection with the acquisition, the Company also (a) issued 350,000 shares of FARO common stock and paid $2.0 million in cash to fully satisfy SMX’s obligations to its two lenders, and (b) assumed or satisfied other debts of SMX.

 

On July 9, 2003, the Company filed with the American Arbitration Association a Statement of Claim (i.e., a demand for arbitration) against John Martinson, as the representative of the former SMX stockholders, for indemnification relating to various breaches of the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement. The Company’s claims principally relate to SMX’s failure to follow generally accepted accounting principles before its acquisition by the Company, SMX’s failure to present fairly in all material respects its financial condition as of December 31, 2001, and SMX’s failure to disclose various liabilities of SMX that arose on or before December 31, 2001. The arbitration is binding and will be held in Tampa, Florida, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.

 

SMX’s former stockholders are obligated, subject to various limitations under the Agreement, to indemnify the Company for breaches of the representations and warranties in the Agreement in proportion to their prior ownership interests in SMX. The Company alleges in the Statement of Claim that it is entitled to $2,286,188 in damages from the former SMX stockholders. To satisfy the indemnity obligations of the former SMX stockholders, the Company previously asserted its right to set off the remaining 422,956 shares of FARO common stock (which includes the 50,000 shares being held in escrow) that have not been delivered to the former SMX stockholders under the Agreement. However, all 850,000 shares of FARO common stock that were to be delivered in connection with the SMX acquisition are considered issued and outstanding shares and are taken into account when computing earnings per share.

 

On or about July 31, 2003, Mr. Martinson, as the representative of the former SMX stockholders, filed an answer to the Company’s Statement of Claim and asserted various counterclaims against the Company. On behalf of SMX’s former stockholders, Mr. Martinson has denied any obligation to indemnify the Company for the allegations described in the Statement of Claim.

 

Moreover, Mr. Martinson has alleged that the Company’s failure to deliver the 422,956 shares of FARO common stock to SMX’s former stockholders under the Agreement constitutes a breach by the Company of the Agreement and that the Company is obligated to indemnify the former SMX stockholders for their damages as result of this breach. Mr. Martinson also has alleged that FARO has converted the 422,956 shares that have not been delivered to SMX’s former stockholders and that FARO has been unjustly enriched by failing to deliver these shares. Mr. Martinson has requested that the arbitrators award damages to the former SMX stockholders as a result of these claims, including punitive damages.

 

19


The Company cannot predict the outcome of SMX arbitration or the impact it may have on the Company. The outcome of the counterclaims asserted in the SMX arbitration could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

Other than the matter described above, the Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the results of such litigation, even if the outcome were unfavorable to the Company, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

20


Item 6.—Exhibits And Reports On Form 8-K

 

a.)   Exhibits:
31 (a)  

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31 (b)  

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32 (a)  

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32 (b)  

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

b.)   Reports on Form 8-K

 

On April 16, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K in connection with a release of revenues for the quarter ended March 29, 2003.

 

On May 9, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K in connection with a release of the Company’s results of operations for the quarter ended March 29, 2003.

 

On July 15, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K in connection with a release of revenues for the quarter ended June 28, 2003.

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: August 8, 2003      

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Registrant)

        By:  

/s/    Gregory A. Fraser


               

Gregory A. Fraser

Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

 

21

Cert - Raab

EXHIBIT 31(a)

 

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Simon Raab, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President of FARO Technologies, Inc., certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FARO Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in FARO Technologies, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 8, 2003
/s/    Simon Raab

Name:      Simon Raab

Title:         President and Chief Executive Officer—Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Cert - Fraser

EXHIBIT 31(b)

 

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Gregory A. Fraser, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer of FARO Technologies, Inc., certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FARO Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in FARO Technologies, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 8, 2003
/s/    Gregory A. Fraser

Name:      Gregory A. Fraser

Title:         Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Cert section 906 - Raab

EXHIBIT 32(a)

 

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”) hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the three months ended June 28, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/    Simon Raab

Simon Raab

 

August 8, 2003

Cert section 906 - Fraser

EXHIBIT 32(b)

 

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of FARO Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 28, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/  Gregory A. Fraser

Gregory A. Fraser

 

August 8, 2003